Whole Milk

{{ oArticle.subtitle }}

Animal Nutrition
Welcome to Should I Eat This? What Is the Nutritional Value of Milk? Try a nice piece of antioxidant-rich dark chocolate instead. Nutrition Wonderland moving towards v2. Unless you are from Northern Europe, you are likely to have problem with dairy in general. Our Research Team is a seasoned group of nutritionists and solution providers, many of whom hold advanced degrees in animal science.

Recipes using milk

a2 Platinum®

However, in general, a quality product will have a layer of thicker cream on the top and thinner milk on the bottom. The can may be shaken to produce a more uniform coconut milk if desired, or the cream may be removed and used for something else. Coconut milk must be refrigerated if not used immediately, as it will spoil otherwise. While coconut milk is high in saturated fat, it is much healthier than other saturated fat products, and the fat is easily metabolized by the body.

Coconut milk also offers some particular health benefits. It is anti-carcinogenic, anti-microbial, anti-bacterial, and anti-viral. The main saturated fat that it contains, lauric acid, is also found in mother's milk and has been shown to promote brain development and bone health. Some hope that coconut milk, with its powerful anti-viral properties, can one day be used in the fight against AIDS.

Coconut milk is immensely rich in vitamins and minerals. Coconut milk contains high levels of some of the crucial minerals like, iron, calcium, potassium, magnesium and zinc. It also contains a significant amount of vitamin C and E.

One cup of coconut milk about gm contains 13 gm carbohydrates, 5 gm fiber, 5 gm protein and 57 gm fats, mainly saturated fats. One cup of coconut milk can provide about calories, which means that coconut milk is high in calories and hence, should be consumed in small amounts.

The fat content of coconut milk is also very high, which too highlights the importance of taking it only in small amounts. Apart from these, one cup of coconut milk also contains about 6. The same amount of coconut milk can give about One of the interesting coconut milk nutrition facts is that it contains a very high level of saturated fats, but the saturated fats found in coconut milk are mainly short and medium chain fatty acids, which are usually not stored by the body as fats.

Instead, such short and medium chain fatty acids have been found to provide instant energy to the body. Apart from these fatty acids, coconut milk contains many other essential nutrients, which can be attributed for several health benefits. Some of the most important benefits of coconut milk are explained below:. A major part of the fats found in coconut milk is lauric acid, which has been found to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties.

This fatty acid can boost the immune system and its disease fighting ability. Lauric acid can also be helpful in maintaining the elasticity of the blood vessels and in keeping them clean, which can lower the risk for conditions like, atherosclerosis and heart disease. Coconut milk also contains several antioxidant compounds, which can provide protection against the harmful free radicals and their damaging effects on the body cells and tissues.

Coconut milk can improve the health of the digestive system and promote digestion. It can relieve the symptoms of stomach ulcers and acid reflux disease as well. With such a high level of iron, it can help to treat anemia caused by iron deficiency. Apart from these, coconut milk may help to relax the nerves and the muscles, control blood sugar level, lower blood pressure and reduce joint inflammation.

Coconut milk can have benefits for hair as well. In fact, it is increasingly used for hair care of late. It contains vitamin E and fats, which can prove effective in moisturizing hair. Fresh coconut milk can nourish hair and promote hair growth.

It can be used for controlling excessive hair fall as well. Along with hair care, coconut milk can be used for skin care as well. It can be used for cleansing the skin pores by removing dirt and excess sebum. When used for skin care, coconut milk can give soft and supple skin and a radiant complexion. Coconut milk can also remove the dead cells from the skin by acting as a gentle exfoliating agent. At the same time, it helps to keep the skin well hydrated and moisturized as well.

The aforementioned information should now help you understand that the relationship between coconut milk and health is a good one, as well as various benefits of coconut milk for hair and skin care. This nutritious milk can be consumed safely by people who are lactose intolerant or have allergy to cows' milk.

Coconut milk is also soy and gluten free and so, people allergic to such substances can also use it. Coconut milk health benefits are mentioned in Traditional Medicine for the human body. It is also used for the treatment of mouth ulcers. Coconut milk has many minerals, vitamins and electrolytes such as calcium, potassium and chloride. Coconut is a dairy free alternative to those who are lactose intolerant and are also allergic to animal milk.

This milk is also nut free, soy free and gluten free. It is good for the health of your skin and hair. Many cosmetic giants use it as a base in products for skin and hair. Apply coconut milk to the scalp to have dandruff free hair and condition your hair naturally.

Coconut milk is a reservoir of antioxidants. Antioxidants help the body fight aging, low vision and low bone density. It also aids in digestion and is also used as a laxative. Here are the nutritional values per g 4 ;. Skim milk contains around 5 grams of carbohydrate per ml and this comes in the form of the milk sugar lactose. Skim milk is fortified with synthetic vitamin D, which is mandated. It may also be fortified with vitamin A, but this is not a mandatory requirement.

This vitamin fortification is because milk loses its natural fat-soluble vitamin content when the fat is removed. As shown in the table, skim milk is an excellent source of dietary calcium and it provides a decent amount of several minerals. Since it is much lower in total calories, skim milk has a much higher protein density than other milk options. One gram of protein is equal to 4 calories, so there is a total of In contrast, whole milk contains the same amount of protein, but the same serving size provides around 60 calories of energy.

With this in mind, skim milk is the better option if someone is looking to increase their protein intake without a lot of excessive calories. Just like whole milk, cheese and all dairy foods, skim milk contains a high amount of calcium.

Firstly, it is important to ensure we consume enough calcium since it has a range of essential roles within our body. These include the loss of natural fat-soluble vitamins, higher sugar density, and yes…. This being the case, when the manufacturing process removes the fat from skim milk, it also loses the majority of these vitamins. Manufacturers must by law fortify skim milk with synthetic vitamin D to make up for this loss. Additionally, some producers may also fortify their milk with vitamin A — it is their choice.

Non-fortified milk will, therefore, have significantly less vitamin A content than whole milk, and it will also lack the small quantities of vitamins E and K A recent study analyzed 30 paired samples of whole milk and skim milk to test their vitamin A contribution toward the RDA On average, the skim milk in this study contributed 1. In contrast, whole milk offered a 7. There are also some concerns that we may not be able to absorb fat-soluble vitamin A in fat-free skim milk.

For instance, one controlled study compared the bio-availability of whole milk and vitamin A-fortified skim milk In this study, 19 volunteers consumed ml of each milk on different days and researchers took their plasma blood levels of vitamin A for 6. The results showed no relative difference in the absorption level of vitamin A between each drink. Skim milk contains the same amount of lactose as whole milk.

However, it contributes a much higher percentage of total energy. Earlier, we looked at how skim milk is more protein-dense than whole milk due to the lower calorie count.

One theory thrown around is that the lactose could have a more significant impact on postprandial after consumption blood-glucose levels. A study conducted by Loren Cordain, among others, showed that there were no significant differences between skim and whole milk consumption on glycemic and insulinemic response Another recent controlled trial also compared the glycemic and insulinemic responses of various milk beverages consumed alongside a pizza!

As you may be aware, saturated fat has been unfairly demonized for decades and it is only recently recovering. While some people still scaremonger about saturated fat, butter sales are back up and people have stopped trimming the fat off their meat. If there was any strong evidence that milk raised the risk of cancer in general, it would be listed at the top of every article on the internet trying to persuade you or scare from drinking milk.

You would see meta analyses of studies on milk that showed a clear connection between milk and cancer. Circumstantial evidence is ok to base our beliefs in when we have no other alternative. But we do have alternatives. Figuring out of there is a connection between a specific food and cancer is much harder than many people assume.

Even if we observe an association, it is not safe to assume that the one thing causes the other — it might as well be the other way around this is called reverse causality — which probably explains why artificially sweetened beverages and obesity are correlated [19] or it could be something else entirely that causes both the exposure and the outcome this is called a confounder.

Observe that an exposure and an outcome that seems connected, does not mean that one thing caused the other. When it comes to research into what raises the risk of cancer, we usually have nothing else than observations like these to go on.

We cannot make longitudinal controlled studies because it would be utterly unethical to try to actively provoke cancer in a group of people and if we did and saw even a small rise in cancer incidence, we would have to end the study immediately.

So how can we know whether something causes cancer or not? In Sir Austin Bradford Hill developed a set of criteria [20] that needs to be fulfilled for a causality between an assumed cause and effect to be established. The Bradford Hill-criteria in summary looks like this:.

A good example of an association that fulfills the Bradford Hill-criteria is smoking and lung cancer. The observed period of time between first exposure and the appearance of diagnosable cancer is congruent with what we would expect. There is a clear dose-response relationship more cigarettes lead to higher risk and there is a good explanation to what we observe, since cigarette smoke contains a long range of strong mutagens that is carcinogenic in both animal and cell studies.

To the best of my knowledge there is not a single food that fulfills the Bradford Hill-criteria for causality. To be able to claim that milk increases the risk of cancer, it would take among other things that milk consumption was consistently correlated with a marked increased risk of cancer and that this effect was dose dependent.

Different studies point in different directions and with some types of cancers it seems like it is protecting against that specific type of cancer but seems to promote other types of cancer. At least that is the focal point of the articles that through blatantly selective presentation of the literature reveals themselves as anti-milk ideologues. Maybe the observed correlations are causal.

Maybe milk plays a small part in both protecting against some cancers, and promoting others. But it is factually wrong to hardheadedly claim that milk causes cancer. The criteria to claim causality simply are not there. A current systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on milk consumption and mortality showed, that milk neither lowers or raises the overall risk of death neither before time or by cardiovascular disease or cancer [25].

So milk in all likelihood is not relevant to worry about when it comes to cancer in humans. And that is perfectly fine because we have other things to worry about — such as smoking, alcohol and obesity — if we really are interested in lowering our risk of getting cancer. First of all, it is inflamed because there exists a plethora of truly horrifying untruths n articles, magazines and books.

These untruths about milk, hormones and cancer is convincing enough to fool even reasonable and rational people. I was myself once fooled by them.

Therefore I would never dream of judging others for believing the same untruths nor for sharing them. Because if it was indeed true that milk was chock-full of hormones that gave us cancer it would be amoral to not shout this information from the rooftops and demand that health professionals took action. It is perfectly fine to think that the production of milk is unethical or that the people responsible for the production of milk or the dairy lobbyists are exaggerating the health benefits of milk consumption.

It is also perfectly fine to question the necessity of milk consumption and whether milk consumption is bad for the environment. As long as you remember to separate the different issues, because none of these attitudes changes what science tells us about milk, hormones or cancer.

Keep up the good work! You missed the most important and dangerous hormone, estrogen. Certain studies have shown a clear increase in estrogen in males after consuming milk.

I especially like the last paragraphs in your usual aplomb.

Beverage Topics